MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1594624700 · doi:10.1063/1.4927035

Viscous flow separation caused by the Marangoni effect in competition with capillary flow

2015· article· en· W1594624700 on OpenAlexaff
Ashkan Babaie, Boris Stoeber

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanomaterials and Printing Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMarangoni effectFlow (mathematics)MechanicsMarangoni numberSurface tensionCapillary actionAdverse pressure gradientHele-Shaw flowPhysicsStokes flowFlow separationInertiaOpen-channel flowThermodynamicsClassical mechanicsBoundary layer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This letter provides an analytical model that describes the viscous flow separation in a drying thin polymer solution film. While conventional flow separation occurs due to an adverse pressure gradient opposing fluid inertia, here we show that flow separation can also be caused by the Marangoni effect in an evaporation-driven creeping flow. The flow separation behavior strongly depends on the surface tension distribution and the interface profile. Viscous flow separation adds to the current understanding of flow physics during the drying of thin films, in addition to the well-known capillary transport and the Marangoni effect.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.271

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of FluidsSame topicNanomaterials and Printing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207