Comorbilidad entre el distrés psicologico y el abuso de drogas en pacientes en centros de tratamiento, en la ciudad de Leon - Nicaragua: implicaciones para políticas y programas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La presencia de trastornos de salud mental y consumo de drogas ambos se conocen como comorbilidad. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo determinar la prevalencia de la comorbilidad entre el distrés psicológico y el abuso/dependencia de drogas en pacientes de Centros de tratamiento en León, Nicaragua. La mayoría de participantes del estudio eran hombres y 68.5% eran menor de 40 años, solteros (58.5%), con bajo nivel de educación, trabajo de forma autónoma (51.2%), y 41.5% viven con su madre biológica. El 65.9% de los pacientes llegaron al centro por cuenta propia. Las drogas más consumida fueron alcohol, marihuana y crack (59.7%, 58.2% y 53.7%). Los trastornos concurrente más comunes fueron, ansiedad (29.3%), depresión (24.1%), esquizofrenia 9.8% y trastorno bipolar 2,4% y según la escala de Kessler K-10, el 56% de los participantes fueron diagnosticados con distrés psicológico severo. Según la escala de APGAR-familiar, el 26% percibieron familias como disfuncionales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".