MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1594805243

Relaxed look-ahead pipelined nonlinear channel equalizer

2004· article· en· W1594805243 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel Massicotte, Thierry Dufour

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPipeline (software)Computer scienceBackpropagationNonlinear systemLook-aheadArtificial neural networkChannel (broadcasting)ThroughputEqualizerAlgorithmParallel computingComputer engineeringArtificial intelligenceWirelessTelecommunications
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a pipelined equalizer for nonlinear channel environment using the relaxed look ahead technique. Nonlinear channel is a known problem that can be treated by artificial neural network (ANN). But, the recursive nature of the adaptation algorithms found in ANN limits their operation speed and high throughput applications require pipelining. The standard look ahead technique is used to pipeline recursive type algorithms and the result often presents a large amount of hardware due to pipelining. In order to minimize this hardware, the relaxed look-ahead technique uses approximations of the look-ahead technique. The combination of these approximations in conjunction with parameter variation can result in a large variety of architectures. This paper will present the relaxed look-ahead technique in a general form and its application to the backpropagation algorithm found in ANN. Simulation results with linear and nonlinear channels will be shown for different pipeline depth. 1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.611
Threshold uncertainty score0.607

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBlind Source Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207