MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1595080983 · doi:10.1109/acc.2015.7171887

Finite state approximations of Markov decision processes with general state and action spaces

2015· article· en· W1595080983 on OpenAlex
Naci Saldı, Tamás Linder, Serdar Yüksel

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicReinforcement Learning in Robotics
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMarkov decision processAction (physics)Finite stateMarkov processComplement (music)State spaceMathematical optimizationMarkov chainApplied mathematicsMathematicsState (computer science)Partially observable Markov decision processMarkov modelStochastic processMarkov kernelApproximations of πComputer scienceVariable-order Markov modelAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

General state space valued optimal stochastic control problems are often computationally intractable. On the other hand, for finite state-action models, there exist powerful computational and simulation tools for computing optimal strategies. With this motivation, we consider finite state and action space approximations of discrete time Markov decision processes with discounted and average costs and compact state and action spaces. Stationary policies obtained from finite state approximations of the original model are shown to approximate the optimal stationary policy with arbitrary precision under mild technical conditions. These results complement recent work that studied the finite action approximation of discrete time Markov decision process with discounted and average costs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.363
Threshold uncertainty score0.246

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReinforcement Learning in RoboticsFrench-language works237,207