MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1595133415 · doi:10.1177/15910199050110s104

Therapeutic Management of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations. Present Role of Interventional Neuroradiology

2005· article· en· W1595133415 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fernando Viñuela, Gary Duckwiler, Reza Jahan, Yuichi Murayama

Bibliographic record

VenueInterventional Neuroradiology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNeuroradiologyInterventional neuroradiologyIntracranial Arteriovenous MalformationsEmbolizationArteriovenous malformationRadiologyNeuroimagingMagnetic resonance imagingInterventional radiologyCerebral angiographyNeurologyAngiography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter summarizes the authors' experience in the endovascular therapy of cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). This clinical series includes 660 patients treated from 1980 to 2005. The first 148 patients were treated at University Hospital, in London, Ontario Canada, in association with Drs. Allan Fox, Dave Pelz, John Girvin and Charles Drake. The next 512 patients were treated at UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California in association with Drs. Gary Duckwiler, Reza Jahan, Jacques Dion, Pierre Gobin, Neil Martin and John Frazee. Only patients treated with superselective endovascular/intraoperative catheterization and embolization of avm arterial feeders were included. Cerebral arteriovenous malformations treated by non-selective injection of beads in ICA or vertebral arteries were excluded. Modern neuroimaging modalities associated to the anatomical, topographic and functional evaluations of cerebral avms such as brain CT and CTA, MRI, MRA and functional MRI are all utilized at UCLA Medical Center. They have become essential in the therapeutic management of avms closely related to cerebral eloquent areas (figure 1).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInterventional NeuroradiologySame topicVascular Malformations Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207