MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1595238962

Croisées de la science et du roman au tournant des Lumières.. Compte rendu de Castonguay-Bélanger (Joël), Les écarts de l’imagination. Pratiques et représentations de la science dans le roman au tournant des Lumières, Montréal, Presses de l’Université de Montréal, coll. « Socius », 2008, 365 p.

2009· article· fr· W1595238962 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Valérie Stienon

Bibliographic record

VenueCOnTEXTES. Revue de sociologie de la littérature · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Issu d’une these de doctorat en cotutelle a l’Universite de Montreal et a l’Universite Paris IV-Sorbonne sous la direction de Michel Delon et Benoit Melancon, l’ouvrage questionne les discours et les representations scientifiques dans le roman francais des annees 1775 a 1810, c’est-a-dire pendant la periode communement nommee, sous l’impulsion de Roland Mortier, le « tournant des Lumieres » (1780-1820). Cette periode constituant une diachronie etudiable dans sa specificite, l’auteur la carac...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.549
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.016
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCOnTEXTES. Revue de sociologie de la littératureSame topicHistorical and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207