MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1595341331

디지털 인체모델링 도구를 이용한 한국인 휠체어 사용자 기본치수 설정에 관한 연구

2006· article· ko· W1595341331 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
박용환

Bibliographic record

Venue대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계 · 2006
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldPsychology
TopicErgonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnthropometryWheelchairDimension (graph theory)Computer scienceMeasure (data warehouse)GeographyMathematicsData miningWorld Wide Web
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There are no reliable anthropometric data on structural and functional measurements for wheelchair users in Korea. Therefore we adapt anthropometric dimensions from foreign countries. According to Bradtmiller(2003), researches on them have been recently completed in the United States, Australia, U.K, Canada, but those suffer from several important limitations: User groups, measurement methods, and research environments vary from one study to the next, which makes difficult to compare their results. Hence, the purpose of this study is to measure Korean wheelchair users anthropometry by digital human modeling tools, and to establish basic dimension for them in architectural designs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.268
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계Same topicErgonomics and Musculoskeletal DisordersFrench-language works237,207