MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1595389869

PocketSnips: Health Education, Technology, and Teamwork

2009· article· en· W1595389869 on OpenAlexaffvenue
PocketSnips Team

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational journal of e-learning & distance education · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiomedical and Engineering Education
Canadian institutionsNOSM University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTeamworkKnowledge managementKey (lock)CLIPSPoint (geometry)Health careCollaborative learningComputer scienceMedical educationMedicinePolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Short video clips are useful for learning clinical procedures, especially at the point of care and in distributed education. A literature review confirmed key points relating to material brevity, adjunct materials, and some evidence of their impact on learning. ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT: Collaborative participation by many groups and organizations has resulted in a high functioning and productive team. Key activities and personal contributions were enhanced by web-based collaborative software that maximizes team effectiveness. FUTURE STEPS: Further external collaboration with future partners around the world will be easier with new licensing and collaborative networking approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.925
Threshold uncertainty score0.429

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational journal of e-learning & distance educationSame topicBiomedical and Engineering EducationFrench-language works237,207