MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1595394133 · doi:10.7202/007650ar

Échange commercial et usages monétaires non-marchands dans le cadre du programme d’aide aux chasseurs du Nunavik

2004· article· fr· W1595394133 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Yohann Cesa

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes/Inuit/Studies · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les réflexions émises dans ce texte concernent tout à la fois une institution nouvelle, celle du programme d’aide aux chasseurs du Nunavik, qui induit — souvent par le biais de congélateurs municipaux — une forme nouvelle de circulation du gibier, mais aussi la monétarisation de l’économie inuit dans ses aspects les moins connus, c’est-à-dire les usages de la monnaie dont on ne sait s’ils sont aujourd’hui spécifiques ou non aux sociétés inuit. Ces réflexions s’appuient sur un usage raisonné des concepts de Karl Polanyi à partir desquels sont problématisés certains aspects de la redistribution effectuée par le programme d’aide aux chasseurs, et notamment la transaction monétaire qui a cours au moment de l’achat du gibier par la mairie.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.782
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.152
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2004
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes/Inuit/StudiesSame topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207