MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1595407324 · doi:10.1002/jmv.24302

Interferon‐inducible Protein 6‐16 (IFI‐6‐16, ISG16) promotes Hepatitis C virus replication in vitro

2015· article· en· W1595407324 on OpenAlexaff
Shan Chen, Shilin Li, Limin Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Virology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatitis C virus research
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsRepliconHepatitis C virusVirologyInterferonBiologyViral replicationRNAVirusTransfectionWestern blotCell cultureIn vitroHepatitis CMessenger RNAHepacivirusMolecular biologyPlasmidGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Interferon-inducible protein 6-16 (IFI-6-16, ISG16) is one of the interferon stimulated genes (ISGs) whose expression levels can be induced by type I interferons. Previous studies from our group indicated that higher expression levels of ISG16 were detected in the pre-treatment liver tissues of patients chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) who do not respond to interferon-based therapy. However, its role in HCV production is not well defined. This study is to test the effect of over-expression of ISG16 on HCV RNA replication and IFN anti-HCV activity in both HCV replicon cells and JFH-1 HCV culture system (HCVcc). Expression plasmid of ISG16 was constructed and transfected into HCV replicon cells or JFH-1 HCV culture system. After confirmation of the successful expression of ISG16 at mRNA (real-time PCR) and protein (Western Blot) levels, HCV RNA level was analyzed by real-time quantitative PCR in the absence or presence of interferon-α. Over-expression of ISG16 promoted HCV RNA replication in both the Con1b replicon and the HCV JFH-1-based cell culture system and blunted the anti-HCV activity of IFN-α. In conclusion, Over-expression of ISG16 promotes HCV RNA replication and rescues the IFNα-mediated anti-HCV activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical VirologySame topicHepatitis C virus researchFrench-language works237,207