Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’écocritique est une approche d’analyse culturelle récente qui est apparue aux États-Unis au cours des années 1980. Elle s’est constituée à partir de l’écologie, discipline scientifique issue de la biologie, puis de l’écologisme, mouvement social provenant d’une certaine critique de la modernité. Les recherches en écocritique s’intéressent aux relations entre l’être humain et l’environnement telles qu’elles sont représentées dans les expressions culturelles. Cette perspective est ici appliquée à La héronnière de Lise Tremblay, un recueil de nouvelles publié en 2003. L’oeuvre offre une relecture de l’opposition entre ruralité et urbanité au Québec. Elle met en scène trois rapports de l’être à son milieu – le rural, l’urbain et le néorural – personnifiés par trois narrateurs qui observent un village indéterminé, mais emblématique. Ces points de vue, examinant les habitats, les migrations et les prédations, dévoilent leurs types de rapports à la nature : domination, consommation et réappropriation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".