La regla hartiana de reconocimiento en el pensamiento garzoniano
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El propósito de este trabajo es describir el acercamiento de Garzón Valdés a la regla hartiana de reconocimiento. Siendo uno de los primeros estudiosos en acercarse a los trabajos de Hart, el posicionamiento de Garzón no puede considerarse aislado ni estático. Existe una continua referencia a las tesis hartianas en la producción iusteórica de Garzón (especialmente una vez que se abandona la influencia de Kelsen en los setenta) que supone una revalorización progresiva. Trataré de mostrar en qué medida los trabajos de Garzón son un ejemplo de que resulta más útil para la Teoría del Derecho reinterpretar los instrumentos de Hart desde la conexión Derecho-Moral que descartarlos por completo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it