MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1595943885

On optimization of substrate removal in a bioreactor with biofilms and suspended biomass

2014· article· en· W1595943885 on OpenAlexaff
Alma Mašić, Hermann J. Eberl

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Conference on Mathematical and Theoretical Biology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiofilmWastewaterBioreactorBiomass (ecology)Substrate (aquarium)Sewage treatmentPulp and paper industryOrganic matterEnvironmental engineeringEnvironmental scienceChemical engineeringChemistryBacteriaWaste managementBiologyEcologyEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Biofilms are layered bacterial communities, attached to a surface in an aqueous environment, constructing a three-dimensional structure that is significantly different from the surrounding that free floating bacteria are found in. Bacteria within biofilms act together as a macrostructure, exhibiting typical characteristics such as a diffusion-limited substrate consumption and a strong antimicrobial resistance. The latter is often the reason why biofilms are so difficult to eradicate, which is a critical issue in cases when biofilms are harmful to their surroundings, for example in dental plaque. In wastewater treatment, however, biofilms are considered beneficial as they are used in biological treatment processes for degradation and collection of organic matter as well as nitrogen and phosphorus. The bacteria grow by consumption of a substrate, which is thereby removed from the wastewater, and produce a compound that is either harmless to the environment or that proceeds through further treatment, before the treated water is released into a receiving water body. Mathematical models of wastewater treatment systems are useful tools for process understanding, design, control and optimization and can prevent lengthy empirical studies. Contrary to the reality of a biofilm reactor, in which a certain amount of suspended biomass always remains present due to erosion from the biofilm, most biofilm reactor models do not include the suspended biomass, assuming its contribution to the process performance is negligible. In this work, we focus on a biofilm reactor with concurrent suspended growth and investigate mathematically the optimal substrate removal in the reactor with respect to the amount of removed substrate and with respect to treatment process duration. For this purpose we assume a reactor setup where the wastewater is fed from a storage reactor into a biological treatment reactor. The resulting two-objective optimal control problem is constructed with the flow rate between the reactors as the selected control and the treatment reactor is modeled by a system of three ordinary differential equations, which indirectly contain a two-point boundary value problem. Due to the singularity of the optimal control problem, it is impractical to determine its solution in the class of measurable functions and unfeasible to implement in reality. By instead choosing a class of off-on functions, motivated by the underlying biological process, we solve a simpler problem of reactor performance optimization. The off-on control functions initially have a no-flow period before switching to a constant flow rate that empties the storage reactor. For this optimal control problem we approximate the Pareto Front numerically and study the system behavior and its dependence on reactor and initial data. In general, we find that the limited potential to improve reactor performance through different control strategies is mainly due to an initial transient period during which the bacteria adapt to the environmental conditions in the reactor. The determination of the length of the transient period depends strongly on the initial state of the dynamic system, which is, thus, often unknown in real applications, wherefore the efficiency of reactor optimization, compared to the uncontrolled system with constant flow rate, is limited.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Conference on Mathematical and Theoretical Biology→Same topicWastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal→French-language works237,207→