Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le catalogue des oeuvres de Pierre Mercure reste des plus énigmatiques ; manuscrits introuvables et bandes magnétiques perdues seraient en cause. Tourné vers les spectacles de danse lors desquels ses oeuvres ont été diffusées – entre 1948 et 1964, Pierre Mercure compose onze musique de danse – , cet article propose d’en retracer l’histoire à partir des photographies, des programmes de spectacles et des articles de presse. Nous verrons par ce corpus comment Mercure repense la composition au fil des années en explorant des trajectoires originales dans son écriture, en utilisant des outils et des techniques des studios de musique électroacoustique et en revisitant le cadre du concert conventionnel avec, d’une part, des danseurs, de l’équipement technologique en lieu et place des interprètes et, d’autre part, un éclairage spécialisé et la participation de collaborateurs en arts visuels. Pierre Mercure aura certes été un grand créateur aux côtés des artistes de Refus global et ceux-ci auront naturellement contribué à la diffusion et à la réception de la musique contemporaine au Québec.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".