MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1596037146 · doi:10.4212/cjhp.v55i1.538

Bracing for Waves, Smooth Sailing Ahead

2002· article· en· W1596037146 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
James Mann

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAttendanceManagementEngineeringPolitical scienceEconomicsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

J C P H – Vol. 55, n 1 – fevrier 2002 14 pate that attendance will total more than 1000 registrants and more than 70 exhibitors will show their wares. The career night will be a full house (with about 30 hospitals exhibiting), and social events will be available to registrants each night. We will provide a full account of the program in the April 2002 issue of CJHP. Team CSHP will manage the waves arising from the PPC and all other events that the membership has come to expect. For example, we look forward to welcoming EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR’S REPORT

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score0.312

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.003
Scholarly communication0.0140.010
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0930.049

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy→Same topicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies→French-language works237,207→