MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1596129152 · doi:10.1109/pess.1999.787451

Adaptive control of power systems using radial basis function network identification and predictive control calculations

2003· article· en· W1596129152 on OpenAlexaff
O.P. Malik

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)IdentifierModel predictive controlRadial basis functionController (irrigation)Computer scienceElectric power systemRadial basis function networkControl systemAdaptive controlIdentification (biology)Power (physics)SIGNAL (programming language)Artificial neural networkControl (management)EngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An adaptive power system stabilizer using an on-line trained radial basis function (RBF) network and a pole-shift predictive controller is developed in this paper. The RBF-identifier is used to identify the system parameters in an on-line mode. In the proposed control, the multi-step ahead predictions are included in the overall performance index. The drawback of multi-step ahead optimization is the computational burden attached to it. In this paper simplifications are proposed using "dynamic control limits" wherein the control limits are not fixed at their absolute physical limits but are calculated on-line. These new control limits are passed to a pole-shifting numerical optimization routine to calculate a suitable control signal. The RBF-identifier and pole-shift coupled model is tested on a single-machine infinite bus power system model to verify its effectiveness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score0.437

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207