Conidiomatal ultrastructure and cultural characteristics of root-inhabiting species of <i>Cryptosporiopsis</i>
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The conidiomatal differences among six root-inhabiting Cryptosporiopsis species were studied at an ultrastructral level and a dichotomous key was then provided. Cryptosporiopsis brunnea is delimited by its conidiomata having a distinct sterile excipular covering tissue without adhesive amorphous material and smooth to pitted macroconidia. Cryptosporiopsis radicicola produces only excipular covering conidioma-like tissue with adhesive amorphous material and setae. Synnematous conidiomata with abundant macroconidia dominate the colony of C. ericae. Cryptosporiopsis rhizophila is different in its globose to subglobose conidiomata, consisting of loosely aggregated vegetative hyphae developing macroconidial conidiophores. Cryptosporiopsis grisea, being the only teleomorph-connected species, differs from the others in its distinct columnar surface structures composed of entangling hyphae and rising well above the aerial mycelium, and unique platform-like hymenium consisting of tightly packed hyphal stroma interspersed with macroconidial conidiophores and localized microconidia conidiophores. Cryptosporiopsis melanigena is distinguished by the production of abundant chlamydospores that secede schizolytically.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it