MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

RADIATION RESPONSE OF SOAKED BARLEY SEEDS

2010· article· en· W1596427465 on OpenAlexafffund
O.P. Kamra, Saroja K. Kamra, R.A. Nilan, C. F. Konzak

Bibliographic record

VenueHereditas · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Genetic and Mutation Studies
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Genetics
FundersInstitute of Genetics
KeywordsLibrary scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MATERIAL AND METHODSBarley (Hordeurn uulgure, hulless variety Himalaya CI 620) seeds (caryopses) were used in this study.Spikes were threshed by hand and only unbroken, fully-formed seeds with 8 per cent moisture (attained by storing in desiccators over dry calcium chloride) were used. Soaking treatmentsThe seeds were soaked for different time intervals (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 20, and 24 hours) at 20' and 30' C while different gases (nitrogen or oxygen) were continuously bubbled through the water (KAMRA et nl., 1960).Control seeds were either not soaked or soaked in oxygen-free distilled water (pH approximately 5.8), which was boiled for at least 15 minutes and then cooled with nitrogen gas bubbling through it.The gases used in these experiments were obtained from commercially filled cylinders.Analysis of these was as follows: Oxygen=99.6"/.O,+0.4 % N, Nitrogen (water pumped) =99.6 % N,+0.4 "/.0, and CO,.After soaking, the seeds were quickly dried with fan-forced air.When air dry, the seeds were placed over a saturated solution of KNO, and NH,C1 in closed containers to bring the moisture content of the seeds to approximately 15 per cent before X-radiation. X-radiation of seedsThe seeds, embryos facing up, were placed in a single layer in petri dishes.The dishes were centered on a turn table situated 42 cms.from : i beryllium window ,4.E.G.50 Machlett X-ray tube operated at 34 kv and 25 ma.A thin Saran plastic film was draped over the dishes during X-radiation to reduce moisture changes in the seeds.These conditions provided 800 r/min. of soft X-rays (unfiltered) at the surface of the seed.Since the seeds were at 15 per cent moisture and hydrated immediately after exposure, the after effects of radiation are minimized (CALDECOTT, 1955 a ) . Effects measuredThe influences of the soaking treatments on X-ray sensitivity of seeds were measured by (A) height of M, seedlings (B) frequencies of chromosomal aberrations in shoot tips of M, seeds and frequencies of seedling chlorophyll mutation in M, populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueHereditasSame topicPlant Genetic and Mutation StudiesFrench-language works237,207