MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1596573178 · doi:10.1002/9781118444122.ch29

Wnt Signaling in Mood and Psychotic Disorders

2014· other· en· W1596573178 on OpenAlexaff
Stephen J. Haggarty, Karun K. Singh, Roy H. Perlis, Rakesh Karmacharya

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNational Institute of Mental HealthStanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad InstituteNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsWnt signaling pathwaySchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Mood disordersDiseaseAutismMental illnessMoodPsychiatryMental healthPsychologyMedicineNeuroscienceBiologyGeneticsSignal transductionPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mental illness represents one of the areas of greatest unmet medical need in the twenty-first century. The causes of severe mental illnesses are heterogeneous in nature and not fully understood. Despite the immense etiological heterogeneity, affected individuals share common behavioral manifestations that increasingly are being shown to arise due to perturbations of common cellular and molecular mechanisms. This chapter summarizes particularly salient observations made by investigators in the Wnt field who have been drawn in to the study of this deeply important and fascinating pathway that may hold keys to mental health and disease. It focuses on the role of Wnt signaling in mood disorders and in psychotic disorders. Evidence from human genetic studies is accumulating, particularly for schizophrenia and autism, that genetic variation in Wnt signaling pathways may play a fundamentally important role in mental health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersFrench-language works237,207