Antibes 13th International Academic Conference, The IISES, Malta
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Conference was taken place in the Antibes town of France between 15-18 October 2014.International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences organized the event.130 researchers, academicians and practitioners participated to the organization, which was happened in the 5-star Garden Beach Hotel.Two parallel sessions were conducted at the same time in this organization in which interdisciplinary studies were in focus.The participation rate to the sessions was very high although Antibes is a holiday village and the weather was hot.Professor Gilles Vandal attended from Canada as an invited speaker.A wide audience accompanied to the author who presented the study of "China Challenges America: A Perspective from Economy and Culture".More than ten questions were addressed in the presentation which lasted almost forty minutes.Questions also continued in coffee breaks after the session.Especially some participants, who are in my opinion probably from Asia pointed out very important details about the presentation.Their contribution caused the presentation owner professor took many notes.As also mentioned above,
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.018 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it