MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1596627292

Hubble Space Telescope Spectroscopy of Eta Carinae and Chi Lupi

2001· dissertation· en· W1596627292 on OpenAlexaff
T. Zethson

Bibliographic record

VenueLund University Publications (Lund University) · 2001
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Particle Physics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsSpectrographAstrophysicsSpace Telescope Imaging SpectrographAstronomyEmission spectrumHubble space telescopeSpectral resolutionStarsSpitzer Space TelescopeSpectroscopyLine (geometry)Doubly ionized oxygenSpectral line
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Eta Carinae is a super-massive, super-luminous star. It is surrounded by a bipolar nebula, the "Homunculus", and several blobs of ejected gas which are the source of a complex emission-line spectrum. This thesis presents results from spectroscopic investigations of the star and its surroundings, performed with the Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph (STIS) and the Goddard High Resolution Spectrograph (GHRS) onboard the Hubble Space Telescope (HST). The age of the equatorial disk in the Homunculus has been studied by measurements of radial velocities of emission lines. Fluorescence processes in Fe II, Fe III, and Cr II are discussed, and the discovery of an ejected filament producing Sr II and [Sr II] emission is reported. Also, a list of 2000 emission line identifications is presented and discussed. The chemically peculiar star Chi Lupi was the target of the "Pathfinder Project", a mapping of the UV spectrum of the star using the GHRS. An investigation of the abundance and isotopic composition of boron in Chi Lupi is presented. The launch of space telescopes has put greater demands on the quality of atomic data needed for the analyses of the observed spectra. This thesis presents laboratory measurements of wavelengths and transitions isotope shifts in the B~II spectrum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.962
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLund University Publications (Lund University)Same topicAstro and Planetary ScienceFrench-language works237,207