Opposing muscarinic and nicotinic modulation of hypoglossal motor output to genioglossus muscle in rats <i>in vivo</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The genioglossus (GG) muscle of the tongue, innervated by the hypoglossal motor nucleus (HMN), helps maintain an open airway for effective breathing. In vitro studies in neonatal rodents have separately characterized muscarinic and nicotinic receptor influences at the HMN but the net effects of combined nicotinic and muscarinic receptor activation and increased endogenous acetylcholine have not been determined in adult animals in vivo. Urethane-anaesthetized, tracheotomized and vagotomised rats were studied. Microdialysis perfusion of acetylcholine into the HMN significantly decreased respiratory-related GG activity (28.5 +/- 11.0% at a threshold dose of 0.1 mm). Application of the cholinergic agonists carbachol and muscarine have similar suppression effects (GG activity was decreased 11.8 +/- 4.3 and 20.5 +/- 5.8%, respectively, at 0.01 microm). Eserine, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, also decreased the amplitude of respiratory-related GG activity (36.4 +/- 11.3% at 1.0 microm) indicating that endogenous acetylcholine modulates GG activity. Although these results showed that suppression of GG activity predominates during cholinergic stimulation at the HMN, application of the nicotinic receptor agonist dimethyl-4-phenylpiperazinium iodide significantly increased tonic and respiratory-related GG activity (156 +/- 33% for respiratory activity at 1.0 mm) showing that excitatory responses are also present. Consistent with this, 100 microm carbachol decreased GG activity by 44.2 +/- 7.5% of control, with atropine (10 microm) reducing this suppression to 13.8 +/- 4.0% (P < 0.001). However, the nicotinic receptor antagonist dihydro-beta-erythroidine (100 microm) increased the carbachol-mediated suppression to 69.5 +/- 5.9% (P = 0.011), consistent with a role for nicotinic receptors in limiting the overall suppression of GG activity during cholinergic stimulation. Application of eserine to increase endogenous acetylcholine also showed that inhibitory muscarinic and excitatory nicotinic receptors together determine the net level of GG activity during cholinergic stimulation at the HMN. The results suggest that acetylcholine has mixed effects at the HMN with muscarinic-mediated GG suppression masking nicotinic excitation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".