MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1596688073

An adaptive genetic algorithm for multi objective flexible manufacturing systems

2002· article· en· W1596688073 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGenetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenetic algorithmComputer scienceFlexible manufacturing systemField (mathematics)Multi-objective optimizationDistributed manufacturingPareto principleMathematical optimizationComputer-integrated manufacturingManufacturing engineeringAlgorithmIndustrial engineeringEngineeringMathematicsMachine learningScheduling (production processes)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A large number of combinatorial problems are associated with manufacturing optimization[l]. The use of intelligent techniques in the manufacturing field has therefore been growing in the last decade. This paper presents a Genetic Algorithm solution for the manufacturing systems in general and flexible manufacturing in particular. In our implementation we have combined a Pareto-based approach with an adaptive weighted sum technique for tackling the multi-objective flexible manufacturing systems problem. Experimental results demonstrate that this approach is very effective for handling such complex systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.583
Threshold uncertainty score0.794

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it