MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1596740940

ASEM 빌딩의 빙축열 설비 시공사례

2000· article· ko· W1596740940 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
하헌우, 류구영, 남임우, Bong Chul Chung

Bibliographic record

Venue대한설비공학회 강연회 및 기타간행물 · 2000
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Applied Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChillerRefrigerantAir conditioningWater chillerChiller boiler systemEngineeringEnvironmental scienceMechanical engineeringHeat exchangerThermodynamics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The enhancement of living standard is accompanied with rising both demand of air-conditioner and construction of large building. Consequently the additional request of electric power tends to be increased abruptly. But construction of power plant to supply to those electric power demand is encountering with the problem of capital and duration of construction. For these reason, the first ice storage system was installed in 1989 by KEPCO, and the application of ice storage system is being adopted gradually. Generally screw chiller, reciprocating chiller and centrifugal chiller are adopted to ice storage system within the country. Especially centrifugal chiller to be used in this system has applied R123 refrigerant. But R123 is restricted by Montreal Protocol, and many advanced states have developed and sell cooling device using other alternative refrigerants. After the consideration of the using of alternative refrigerant and the comparison of operation cost and efficiency, R134a centrifugal chiller was applied instead of R123 machine

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.140
Threshold uncertainty score0.469

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1400.109

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue대한설비공학회 강연회 및 기타간행물Same topicEngineering Applied ResearchFrench-language works237,207