MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1596764464

An Examination of the Pointe Shoe as Artifact through Ethnographic and Gender Analysis

2003· article· en· W1596764464 on OpenAlex
Kristin Harris

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterial Culture Review / Revue de la culture matérielle · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicDiversity and Impact of Dance
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDanceFolkloreArtEthnographyBalletHumanitiesSymbol (formal)EthnologySociologyGender studiesAnthropologyVisual artsLiterature
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Footwear in dance is largely utilitarian, providing support to the dancer, and aesthetic to the audience. However, choice of footwear in various dance styles may, in fact, act as a symbol as well, signifying attitudes towards gender, power, and individuality. This paper examines ballet and modem footwear through dance, folklore, feminist and ethnographic analysis. Resume Les chaussures de danse jouent surtout un role utilitaire, apportant soutien aux danseurs et beaute aux spectateurs. Mais en fait, dans divers styles de danse, le choix des chaussures peut egalement jouer un role symbolique et signifier des attitudes a l'egard de l'appartenance a un sexe, le pouvoir et l'individualite. Cet article examine les chaussons de ballet et les chaussures modernes au moyen de l'analyse de la danse et du folklore ainsi que de l'analyse feministe et ethnographique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.630
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it