MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1596806238

Mahasweta Devi's Documentary/fiction as Critical Antidote: Rethinking Bonded Labour, 'Women and Development' and the Sex Trade in India

2002· article· en· W1596806238 on OpenAlex
Sophie McCall

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueResources for feminist research · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSouth Asian Cinema and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyEthnographyGender studiesFace (sociological concept)ConversationLiteratureHistoryArtAnthropologySocial science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, I argue that Mahasweta Devi's meticulously researched documentary/fiction, which moves fluidly between history, ethnography and reportage, provide a crucial antidote to three vexed problems in South Asian studies: bonded labour, and development and sex trade. Researchers have treated bonded labour, women's and prostitution as separate discourses. Yet Devi's women characters include wives, sisters and daughters of bonded labourers, women who as bonded labourers, and bonded prostitutes. By using fictional modes of irony and satire, Devi's documentary / fiction invites multiple readings of sociological critical frameworks and defies neat conclusions about subalternity that reader might be tempted to make. I believe in documentation. After reading my work, reader should face truth of facts, and feel duly ashamed of true face of India. --Mahasweta Devi, An Outsider and an Insider at Same Time Sometimes Crook imagines some bespectacled town gentleman who has come by car, and listening to him, is writing down everything.... No such conversation has taken place. Crook has thought it all up. If such a thing had happened, if some bespectacled gentleman had come, words like this are what he would have heard from Crook Nagesia. --Mahasweta Devi, Douloti BountifulMahasweta Devi's(1) meticulously researched documentary / fiction, which moves fluidly between history, ethnography and reportage, provides a critical antidote to three problems in South Asian studies: bonded labour, and development, and sex trade. Researchers have treated bonded labour, women's and prostitution as separate discourses, in isolation from one another. Yet Devi's women characters include wives, sisters and daughters of bonded labourers, women who as bonded labourers, and bonded prostitutes. Most studies on bonded labour focus on men working in agricultural sector before 1976, year in which debt-bondage was officially abolished in India. Devi's stories show that forms of indenture have continued well beyond 1976, and have especially exerted their force on 'invisible labour sectors, such as women, who perform casual or unpaid labour, and prostitutes, who off debts at compound interest in brothels. Devi's stories contest those studies that have consistently naturalized and rendered invisible women's bonded labour. By using fictional modes of irony and satire, Devi's stories subvert easy assumptions about subalternity and the modes of oppression (Bardhan, 1990) that tribal, low- or out-of-caste women in sex trade are subject to.Studies on bonded labour in India tend to assume a gender-neutral perspective, thereby focussing on men's debt-bondage to exclusion of women's (Tripathy, 1989; Prakash, 1990; Bose, 1993; Lerche, 1995; Brass, 1998; van der Linden, 1998). In these studies, relations within family become subsumed under discussions of family labour relations. As a result, women's unpaid becomes naturalized as part of traditional structures of family labour. Women and development studies in India, which cover a range of feminist perspectives, foreground how analytical category of work renders invisible women's subordination as wives, sisters or mothers (Mukhopadhyay, 1984; Sen, 1985; Lessinger, 1990; Saran and Sandhwar, 1990; Kabeer, 1994; Himmelweit, 1995). However, these studies tend to universalize figure of Third World woman worker, thereby eliding questions of class, caste and ethnicity (Mohanty, 1991, 1997; Kannabiran and Kannabiran, 1997; Shohat, 1997; Olsen and Murthy, 2000). Furthermore, as Gayatri Spivak has shown, and development studies tend to depict the broad spectrum of women's issues...as subsumable under feudal mode of production without articulating impact of colonial-capitalist economies on women (Spivak, 1993, p. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.826
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it