MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1597036022 · doi:10.5006/c2007-07517

Monitoring Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion: a Review of Techniques

2007· review· en· W1597036022 on OpenAlexaff
Reeta Sooknah, Sankara Papavinasam, R. Winston Revie

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCorrosion Behavior and Inhibition
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorrosionForensic engineeringEnvironmental scienceMaterials scienceComputer scienceMetallurgyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion (MIC) is estimated to be a factor in causing about 30-40% of total corrosion-related failures. This type of corrosion results from the formation of biofilms on metal surfaces. The activities of a consortium of microorganisms in the biofilm influence corrosion by altering the electrochemical conditions at the metal-solution interface. MIC monitoring thus requires a combination of microbiological, surface analytical and electrochemical techniques. This paper reviews various techniques available to monitor MIC including molecular biology techniques, surface analytical tools and electrochemical methods. The paper also highlights an online electrochemical probe that can simultaneously monitor both microbial activity and corrosion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.770
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCorrosion Behavior and InhibitionFrench-language works237,207