MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A new method for real‐time monitoring of soil CO<sub>2</sub> efflux

2012· article· en· W1597042741 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Martin Lavoie, Jennifer Owens, D. A. Risk

Bibliographic record

VenueMethods in Ecology and Evolution · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPlant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
FundersCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorParks Canada
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceTransectTemporal resolutionFlux (metallurgy)Soil scienceMeteorologyGeologyGeographyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary 1. A better understanding of temporal and spatial variability of soil CO2 fluxes is essential to improve model predictions of soil effluxes. To accomplish that goal, high‐frequency and long‐term data sets for model development and validation are needed. However, the cost and high maintenance associated with the current technology make high‐frequency measurements for small or large spatially distributed grids difficult to achieve. Here, we describe a new observational infrastructure for monitoring soil CO2 efflux, which is attractive because of its low cost and low power consumption compared to traditional methods. 2. Three observational stations equipped with forced diffusion (FD) chambers were deployed in the summer of 2010 across a 1000‐km transect in Atlantic Canada. At half‐hourly resolution, each observational station recorded soil carbon dioxide (CO2) efflux from two flux chambers and from a suite of meteorological sensors and peripherals. Each station was equipped with telemetry, and data were continuously downloaded for c. 1 year. 3. The average power consumption for each station was roughly a third of a LI‐COR LI‐8100 system. The FD chambers were approximately four times more affordable than conventional equipment and were also reliable with <1% of the data lost because of power failure. 4. High‐frequency observations from the three sites showed that the systems were extremely dynamic, with CO2 efflux dependency to temperature and moisture on many time‐scales. For instance, the data showed pronounced increases in soil CO2 efflux after major rain events. The results from the FD chambers also highlighted the role of other biological and physical factors on soil CO2 efflux. 5. Overall, this new method was very successful in key areas including survivability, management intensity and cost. The high‐frequency data hold many interesting features that are not captured in synoptic data sets and which will be useful for tuning our understanding of soil carbon dynamics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2012
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMethods in Ecology and EvolutionSame topicPlant Water Relations and Carbon DynamicsFrench-language works237,207