MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1597128692 · doi:10.1109/milcom.2005.1605701

Signal Detection for Orthogonal/Quasi-Orthogonal Space-Frequency Block Coded OFDM Transmit Diversity Schemes

2006· article· en· W1597128692 on OpenAlexaff
Siva D. Muruganathan, A.B. Sesay

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingSpace–time block codeBlock codeAlgorithmDecoding methodsComputer scienceMultiplexingDetectorDiversity gainMIMOCoding gainQR decompositionMathematicsElectronic engineeringChannel (broadcasting)TelecommunicationsFadingPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The combination of space-time block coding (STBC) and orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) has drawn much attention in recent years. However, the application of conventional STBC decoding for OFDM renders poor performance due to high channel gain variation across the STBC codeword. In this paper, we propose a square root and division free recursive QR (SDRQR) decomposition based detector for STBC coded OFDM systems that utilize four transmit antennas. The proposed detection scheme is applied to both orthogonal and quasi-orthogonal STBCs. Performance of the proposed detector is evaluated semi-analytically and compared with results obtained from exact link simulations. Our analyses show an excellent performance gain attained by SDRQR compared to previously proposed solutions. It is also shown that the relative computational complexity of the proposed detector is justified by the performance gain it attains over the previous solutions

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207