MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1597144743

Moral Inquiry of Cultural Preference Among Contemporary College Students

2015· article· en· W1597144743 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Gang Nathan Dong, YI Lian-yun

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIdeological and Political Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopularityIdeologyPreferenceMainstreamSociologyChinaContradictionCultural diversityPsychologyAestheticsSocial psychologyPoliticsSocial scienceEpistemologyPolitical scienceAnthropologyLawPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

According to the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, culture is blood vessel for national and spiritual home for people. Under the influence of cultural environment, the cultural preference of undergraduates is reflected as the contradiction between decreasing cognition of traditional culture and blind worship of western culture, between weak mainstream ideology and popularity of multi-culture. Through survey and moral inspection about cultural preference of contemporary college students, the effective ways to realize moral redemption of cultural preference of contemporary undergraduates are to guide mainstream value of undergraduates with Chinese traditional culture, to cultivate cultural confidence of undergraduates, to build good atmosphere for propagating Chinese traditional culture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.988
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.255
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social scienceSame topicIdeological and Political EducationFrench-language works237,207