Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the Acknowledgements he inserts at the back of his 1998 novel Paris Trance, (1) Geoff Dyer lists ten instances in which, using an analogy from hip-hop, he says he sampled Sun Also Rises. Dyer did not choose appropriate such familiar Hemingway lines as awfully easy be hard-boiled about everything in the daytime, but at night it another thing and Isn't it pretty think so? Instead, he borrowed such banalities as was amazing champagne (PT 120), was raining hard outside (PT 173), and took big gulp of coffee (PT 218). effect make mockery of literary debt, suggest that, even in the most insipid statements, we cannot help but echo others. Dyer presents himself as self-conscious avatar of the Lost Generation, the disenchanted exiles who had already exhausted irony by the time that Gertrude Stein bestowed on them the famous epithet. But it hard be more arch than the arch-champions of modern angst. Quoting F. Scott Fitzgerald in the very first sentence--merely affirm that twenty-six, the age of the protagonist, a fine age for man (PT 1)--Paris Trance study in belatedness, the story of young expatriates who arrive in Paris seventy years after it has ceased be moveable feast. Dyer's novel recounts the Parisian experiences of an Englishman whose name, Luke Barnes, brands as scion of Hemingway's Jake Barnes. Early in his Paris stay, Luke orders beer at cafe that posts sign that reads: Ernest Hemingway did not drink here (PT 17); and it only serves underscore how very difficult it for an expat writer at the end of the twentieth century avoid the spirits of the Lost Generation. Luke arrives in the eleventh arrondissement with vague ambitions of creating novel about his own experiences abroad. A consummate slacker, he never does. Why write something if you can live it? (PT 219), Luke, described by friend as a complete waster (PT 146), asks. He earns living lifting parcels in book warehouse but comes life with conversation, drugs, films, food, and sex. Luke meets fellow Briton Alex Warren while both are hauling books, and the two soon become inseparable. Each acquires lover, and the foursome forms small community of expatriates intent on living in the moment. Historically, the cultural moment comes seven decades too late. The ideal, explains Alex's lover, Sahra, is feel at home anywhere, everywhere (PT 95). Sahra, who has been living in Paris for the past three years, grew up in Libya, Chicago, and Singapore, and her ideal seems indistinguishable from feeling at home nowhere. Luke forms strong sexual bond with Serbian emigre called Nicole. Not only does her name recall the character in Fitzgerald's Tender the Night, but it also portends parallel the collapse of Nicole and Dick Diver's rapturous life in France. As narrator of Paris Trance, Alex Luke as Fitzgerald's Nick Carraway Jay Gatsby. Alex idolizes Luke. his life--and not mine--which exemplary, admirable, even enviable (PT 1), insists Alex in the first paragraph of the novel. In another of many instances of life imitating life within Dyer's art, Alex emulates his inimitable friend. You like imagining you're him (PT 147), notes Sahra. But Alex also witnesses Luke's self-destruction and the disintegration of the ecstatic Paris trance that Luke tries construct for himself and the other expatriates attracted him. Luke disappears, and eight years later, when Alex tracks down in shabby London flat, he finds listless, sottish recluse, charismatic personality blunted by TV and beer. It Alex who ends up writing the autobiographical novel that Luke never even started, which, in fact, Paris Trance. He also sires son, who, in yet another act of duplication, given the name Luke. A mirror said to ghost when the reflections it offers are slightly delayed. An ancient looking glass that Nicole has brought with her from Belgrade frequently ghosts. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".