MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1597271272 · doi:10.1002/9781118519301.ch8

Reversible Spin Pairing in Crystalline Organic Radicals

2013· other· en· W1597271272 on OpenAlexaff
Jeremy M. Rawson, John J. Hayward

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnetism in coordination complexes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiamagnetismPairingParamagnetismChemistryPhase transitionChemical physicsExcited stateSpin (aerodynamics)RadicalPopulationElectronic structureCondensed matter physicsAtomic physicsComputational chemistryPhysicsThermodynamicsQuantum mechanicsMagnetic fieldOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter considers organic spin-transition materials whose electronic structures can be manipulated in a conceptually similar but substantially different chemical fashion, by examining the fine interplay between inter-electron repulsion or pairing energy and promotion energy to a low-lying vacant orbital. It begins with a discussion of stable free-radicals and their tendency to associate to form dimmers. The chapter focuses on computational and experimental studies of the electronic structures of these dimers in the gas phase and in solution. It chapter extends these discussions to the solid state and investigates examples to explain (i) thermal population of electronic excited states leading to a gradual thermal evolution of paramagnetism upon warming, and (ii) first order solid state phase transitions in which bond cleavage can lead to abrupt diamagnetic-paramagnetic phase transitions. It presents a case study on trithiatriazinyl (TTTA), which is the most comprehensively studied member of the family of spin-transition compounds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.640
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6460.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMagnetism in coordination complexesFrench-language works237,207