MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1597476578 · doi:10.7202/032919ar

The Gravity Signature of a Large Quaternary Depocentre off Southeastern Canada

2007· article· en· W1597476578 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
R C Courtney, David J. W. Piper

Bibliographic record

VenueGéographie physique et Quaternaire · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuaternaryGeologyPaleontologyContinental marginGravity anomalyPassive marginBathymetryIsopach mapMargin (machine learning)SedimentNeogeneOceanographyTectonicsStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New bathymetry, gravity and Pliocene - Quaternary sediment isopach maps have been compiled and gridded for the Scotian margin. A large positive gravity anomaly exists over the Laurentian Fan, which is the major Pliocene - Quaternary depocentre on the Scotian margin. This gravity anomaly is not related to deep structure but can be largely explained by considering the Pliocene-Quaternary sediments as isostatically uncompensated. This implies that the underlying continental margin lithosphère has had considerable strength for at least 3 Ma. Some residual anomalies not accounted for by Pliocene-Quaternary sediment thickness may represent thicker Miocene depocentres, but improved seismic and stratigraphie data are required to assess this possibility. The technique of gravity identification of major sediment depocentres is a useful reconnaissance tool in certain circumstances, such as where there is a topographic expression and the deposit is thick and of major areal extent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGéographie physique et QuaternaireSame topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207