The Mirror Game: Reflections of Young Canadians in Dennis Foon's Child Advocacy Drama
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resume: Dramaturge a la reputation internationale, Dennis Foon est un habile createur de pieces de qui refletent les preoccupations des jeunes Canadiens d'aujourd'hui. En tant que pionnier du theâtre au service de la jeunesse, son objectif est triple: mobiliser, informer et valoriser son jeune auditoire. Le profil que S. Gibson-Gray nous presente est fonde sur sa recherche doctorale et sur des entrevues accordees par l'auteur entre 1988 et 1996. Summary: Dennis Foon is world renowned as a master craftsman of plays which reflect the culture and concerns of contemporary Canadian youth. As one of Canada's leading pioneers in child advocacy theatre, Foon's threefold dramatic objective is to engage, inform, and empower his young audiences. This profile of Dennis Foon's life and works is based on my doctoral (and my more recent) research on Foon, and on a series of conversations I have had with the playwright between 1988 and 1996.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.051 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".