Neurosurgical implications of osteogenesis imperfecta in children
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by disruption of normal collagen formation resulting in varying degrees of skeletal vulnerability, ligamentous laxity, and scleral discoloration. Children with OI may suffer from complex neurosurgical problems affecting the brain and spine. The authors sought to determine the neurosurgical implications of OI in a cohort of patients treated at a quaternary care center for pediatrics. The authors reviewed the case histories of 10 children with OI treated by the neurosurgical service at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto between January 1988 and March 2007. The cases of 4 of these children are highlighted in the article. The most common neurosurgical conditions encountered in this cohort included macrocephaly in 5 patients, subdural hematoma in 3 patients, epidural hematoma in 2 patients, and hydrocephalus in 3 patients. Basilar invagination and spinal fractures were observed in 20% of the cohort. Although some patients could be treated nonoperatively, several required craniotomy for clot evacuation, decompression, and spinal fixation for fracture or basilar invagination, and cerebrospinal fluid shunt insertion. Neurosurgical conditions affecting patients with OI include macrocephaly, the development of an acute intracranial hematoma after often minimal trauma, the development of chronic subdural fluid collections that may require drainage, hydrocephalus (both communicating and noncommunicating), basilar invagination, and subaxial spinal fractures. Surgery may be complicated in some children because of the underlying bone fragility and bleeding diathesis commonly observed in patients with OI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".