MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1597639616

Mona Oikawa. Cartographies of Violence: Japanese Canadian Women, Memory, and the Subjects of the Internment

2014· article· en· W1597639616 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Patricia E. Roy

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian ethnic studies · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRedressHistoriographyImmigrationCitizenshipHistoryGender studiesSociologyMedia studiesLawPoliticsPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mona Oikawa. Cartographies of Violence: Japanese Canadian Women, Memory, and Subjects of Internment. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2012. Xvii + 457 pp. Maps. Photographs. Notes. Bibliography. Index. $39.95 sc. A few years after Redress Settlement of 1988, Mona Oikawa used a semi-structured approach to interview eleven women of Japanese origin who were forcibly removed from Pacific Coast in 1942. Her goal was to map the Internment [which] physically and socially expelled Japanese Canadians from nation as well as rights of citizenship (13). She also interviewed ten of their daughters to determine legacy of Internment through generations. The interviews confirm much of what is known of war-time experiences of Japanese in ghost towns, beet fields of Alberta and Manitoba, and other places in which, to use Oikawa's word, they were incarcerated. What is new is emphasis on loss of important intangibles such as destruction of networks of families and friends, educational opportunities, and language. The loss of language, of course, is not unique to descendants of Japanese immigrants. Regrettably, except in some of later chapters, interviews comprise only a minor part of book. The early chapters deal mainly with theory--including Foucault and feminism--and include an overview of a selected historiography of Japanese Canadians in war years. The historiographical section is very critical of Mutual Hostages, a book of which I was one of four authors. That book has problems but it was published almost twenty-five years ago. I was surprised that Oikawa did not engage with my The Triumph of Citizenship (2008) which reflects further research and reflection. Of course, Oikawa and I have a very different approach to methodology. Whereas she judges historical actions by standards of her own time, I believe historians must also endeavour to explain events in context of times in which they occurred. Although Oikawa is much too young to have been directly affected by expulsion of Japanese Canadians from Pacific Coast, her anger at treatment they endured during and immediately after Second World War is apparent in very use of word Violence in title. Calling them euphemisms, she rejects such terms as interior housing centres, and sugar beet projects. Instead, she describes all locations to which Japanese Canadians were sent as carceral places. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.235
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian ethnic studiesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207