“We want our City back!” Estrategias y valores ante las reformas metropolitanas
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Las reformas metropolitanas ponen en evidencia la existencia de visiones dispares sobre el municipio y los mecanismos de gobierno de las areas metropolitanas, teorizadas bajo cuatro corrientes (escuelas de la reforma y de la eleccion racional, perspectivas neo-regionalista y rescalar). En este articulo analizamos, mediante el caso de Montreal, como los actores se apropian de estas visiones y se movilizan para defender su ideal metropolitano. Las estrategias y valores ante las reformas metropolitanas no se producen en el vacio sino que estan condicionadas por las normas del sistema politico e institucional. Asi, la capacidad de influencia de los actores en las reformas esta marcada por las reglas del juego politico, que favorecen y legitiman las ideas de unos grupos por encima de otros
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it