Transport Phenomena in Polymer Electrolyte Membranes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The insight gained from the analysis conducted in Part I (see the preceding article) is used in the development of a general transport model for water and protons in perfluorosulfonic acid membranes based on the binary friction model. As a tool for investigating the unknown parameters in the general membrane transport model, a simplified conductivity model is derived to represent conditions found in alternating current (ac) impedance conductivity measurements. This binary friction conductivity model (BFCM) is applied to 1100 equivalent weight (EW) Nafion, and compared to other established membrane models. It is shown to provide a more consistent fit to the data over the entire range of water contents and at different temperatures. The subset of transport coefficients in the BFCM is the same as in the general binary friction membrane model (BFM2), and thus with additional data on water transport, the BFM2 model and all its required parameters can be fully specified. The paper discusses possible experimental investigations and fundamental simulations to determine the model parameters required to apply the general BFM2 to predict coupled proton and water transport in PEM fuel cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".