MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1597885518

외국대회 사례 분석을 통한 NURA 로켓대회의 방향성 제언

2012· article· ko· W1597885518 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
이설희, 김일수, 윤영빈, 이훈희

Bibliographic record

Venue한국추진공학회 학술대회논문집 · 2012
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldEngineering
TopicMarine and Coastal Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCONTESTAmateurRocket (weapon)AeronauticsPoint (geometry)EngineeringPolitical scienceLawMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

NURA(The National Universities’ Rocket Assosication), started in 1992, held the 21th Rocket Launching Contest this year. As the size of Rockets and related techniques improved recently, related codes need to be reformed. Papers on the amateur rocket safety rules and overseas cases such as NAR(National Association of Rocketry), CAR(Canadian Association of Rocketry) were studied. The overall rocket modeling, contest and NURA operation were discussed from the point of view of a Korean Universities’ amateur rocketry association.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue한국추진공학회 학술대회논문집Same topicMarine and Coastal ResearchFrench-language works237,207