MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1598035194 · doi:10.7202/1007744ar

La gentrification de La Petite-Patrie. Quelle place et quel pouvoir pour les aînés ?

2012· article· fr· W1598035194 on OpenAlex
Jean‐Pierre Lavoie, Damaris Rose, Victoria E. Burns, Véronique Covanti

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueDiversité urbaine · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueMcGill UniversityCentre de Santé et de Services Sociaux Cavendish
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pour les résidents qui vieillissent, le quartier gagne en importance. Dans une dynamique de déprise associée au grand âge, les géographies personnelles diminuent. Les relations sociales tendent alors à se restreindre au quartier qui fournit un sentiment de sécurité. C’est pourquoi les gérontologues favorisent le vieillir chez soi. Toutefois, lorsque le quartier est en plein changement, quelles sont les répercussions sur les résidents âgés ? L’étude présentée s’intéresse aux perceptions des personnes âgées quant à l’évolution du quartier de La Petite-Patrie (Montréal) et les répercussions sur leur vie quotidienne. Ces bouleversements, dont certains sont liés à la gentrification, et la déprise associée au vieillissement semblent se conjuguer pour rendre les personnes âgées de plus en plus invisibles et exclure les plus démunies de l’espace public.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.704
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it