MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1598265526

La moralitat de la política lingüística. Un estudi comparat de la legitimitat liberal-democràtica de les polítiques lingüístiques de Quebec i Catalunya.

2003· dissertation· ca· W1598265526 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Albert Branchadell Gallo

Bibliographic record

VenueTDX (Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa) · 2003
Typedissertation
Languageca
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHuman Rights and Immigration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El objetivo de esta tesis es contribuir a la formulacion de una teoria normativa de la politica linguistica, entendiendo que una teoria de este tipo tiene por objeto esclarecer que formas de politica linguistica (no) son moralmente permisibles en una democracia liberal. En lugar de postular una serie de valores liberal-democraticos y deducir de ellos las politicas linguisticas permisibles, esta tesis opta estudiar dos casos concretos de politicas linguisticas (los de Quebec y Cataluna) para inferir unos criterios generales que tengan validez mas alla de estos casos. El marco teorico de la tesis es la revision de la teoria liberal-democratica en los anos 90 del siglo XX por parte de autores como Taylor, Kymlicka, Requejo y otros, y mas concretamente lo que Kymlicka llama culturalismo liberal, segun el cual el proteccionismo cultural es moralmente permisible en una sociedad libre y democratica, siempre que respete determinados limites infranqueables. La cuestion clave, en este sentido, es hasta que punto es posible restringir derechos y libertades basicos como parte de una politica linguistica encaminada a la proteccion de una lengua. Una vez formulado el marco teorico de la tesis, esta se adentra en los problemas sociolinguisticos que dieron lugar a las politicas linguisticas de Quebec y Cataluna, para exponer luego sobre este trasfondo las principales decisiones legislativas en que se encarnan estas politicas linguisticas. Posteriormente, se analizan las principales areas de controversia relativas a estas decisiones legislativas, con un analisis pormenorizado de la subsiguiente jurisprudencia del Tribunal Supremo de Canada y del Tribunal Constitucional y el Tribunal Supremo espanoles. De esta misma jurisprudencia se extrae un criterio de proporcionalidad que sirve para discriminar las restricciones de libertades y derechos basicos que podemos considerar moralmente permisibles en una sociedad libre y democratica de otras restricciones que cabe rechazar en todo caso.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.271
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.360 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTDX (Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa)Same topicHuman Rights and ImmigrationFrench-language works237,207