How to Evaluate and Judge When the Moral-Educational Dimension of Instruction Is Concerned?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The text examines the question of what value framework moral education in the public school of a democratic, multicultural society can legitimately rely on. The Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia and education legislation establish the concept of human rights (and duties) as the fundamental ethical and legal norm in Slovenia. From the aspect of legality and legitimacy, the concept has been established as the normative basis that must also be followed with regard to moral education in public schools. The author argues (and provides two practical cases as illustrations) that the right of parents to educate their children in accordance with their religious or philosophical beliefs does not require public school to avoid addressing “contentious” topics, although they may cause children moral distress. The only thing that public school must ensure is for knowledge to be transmitted objectively, critically, and pluralistically, and guarantee that there is nothing that could lead to indoctrination. This means that school and teachers must not impose any views on children about which people differ or require them to identify with a particular viewpoint. Rather, they must express the differences very clearly and allow for the co-existence of and respect for different views.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it