Le prix Architecture de bibliothèques et de centres d’archives du Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le prix Architecture de bibliothèques et de centres d’archives du Québec est un prix bisannuel qui a été créé par le Congrès des milieux documentaires du Québec en 2011. Cet article retrace l’origine du prix en 2010, la mise en place des règlements et, pour les années 2011 et 2013, la formation du jury, la remise du prix et d’une mention honorifique. Chacune des sept candidatures de 2011 et des neuf candidatures de 2013 est illustrée d’une photographie. Les commentaires du jury de 2011 expriment les qualités de la lauréate du prix 2011, la Bibliothèque Raymond-Lévesque de la Ville de Longueuil, ainsi que celles de la mention accordée à la Bibliothèque de l’Université Laval. Quant à eux, les commentaires du jury du prix 2013 expriment les qualités de la lauréate de 2013, la Bibliothèque Laure Conan, de la Ville de La Malbaie, ainsi que celles de la mention accordée à la Bibliothèque Memphrémagog de la Ville de Magog.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.034 | 0.032 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".