MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1598428917 · doi:10.1109/acc.2015.7171855

Sampled-data observer for one-sided Lipschitz systems: Single-rate and multirate cases

2015· article· en· W1598428917 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLipschitz continuityControl theory (sociology)Observer (physics)Nonlinear systemStability (learning theory)MathematicsComputer scienceLinear matrix inequalityDiscrete time and continuous timeMathematical optimizationControl (management)StatisticsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The problem of sampled-data observer design is addressed for the so-called nonlinear systems with one sided Lipschitz nonlinearity in presence of disturbance inputs. We first develop a single-rate observer using a refined Euler model formulated via tractable linear matrix inequalities (LMIs). This scheme is shown to be input-to-state stable from exogenous disturbances to the estimation error in a semiglobal practical sense for the unknown exact discrete-time plant model. Then, the proposed observer is modified appropriately to cope with the practical case of multirate sampling by preserving similar stability property. A simulation example justifies the efficiency of both observers for the one-sided Lipschitz systems and demonstrates the superiority of the multirate observer when the input and output signals are sampled at different rates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.631
Threshold uncertainty score0.854

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.343
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.049 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsFrench-language works237,207