MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1598462530 · doi:10.1002/asna.201211792

Brite‐Constellation: A status report

2012· article· en· W1598462530 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Andreas Kaiser, R. Kuschnig, W. W. Weiß, BRITE-Constellation team

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomische Nachrichten · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinisterstwo Edukacji i NaukiIndian Space Research Organisation
KeywordsConstellationPhotometry (optics)PhysicsStarsSpace (punctuation)AstronomyMillimeterRemote sensingTelecommunicationsComputer scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The BRITE‐Constellation, short for “BRIght Target Explorer” Constellation, is a group of six nanosatellites from Austria, Poland and Canada carrying thirty millimeter aperture optical telescopes with a CCD camera. The goal of the mission is to photometrically measure low‐level oscillations and temperature variations of the brightest stars in the sky down to a visual magnitude of 4.0, with unprecedented precision and time coverage not achievable from ground in two colors. The improved three‐axis pointing performance which is a critical element that makes this high precision photometry mission feasible is a recent development by the University of Toronto’s Space Flight Laboratory. The University of Vienna and the FFG/ALR (Austria’s space agency) are financing the development of two satellites. The Polish Academy of Sciences is funding two additional satellites as well as the Canadian Space Agency resulting in six components for the constellation (© 2012 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.265

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0790.041

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomische NachrichtenSame topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesFrench-language works237,207