MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1598462530 · doi:10.1002/asna.201211792

Brite‐Constellation: A status report

2012· article· en· W1598462530 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Andreas Kaiser, R. Kuschnig, W. W. Weiß, BRITE-Constellation team

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomische Nachrichten · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinisterstwo Edukacji i NaukiIndian Space Research Organisation
KeywordsConstellationPhotometry (optics)PhysicsStarsSpace (punctuation)AstronomyMillimeterRemote sensingTelecommunicationsComputer scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The BRITE‐Constellation, short for “BRIght Target Explorer” Constellation, is a group of six nanosatellites from Austria, Poland and Canada carrying thirty millimeter aperture optical telescopes with a CCD camera. The goal of the mission is to photometrically measure low‐level oscillations and temperature variations of the brightest stars in the sky down to a visual magnitude of 4.0, with unprecedented precision and time coverage not achievable from ground in two colors. The improved three‐axis pointing performance which is a critical element that makes this high precision photometry mission feasible is a recent development by the University of Toronto’s Space Flight Laboratory. The University of Vienna and the FFG/ALR (Austria’s space agency) are financing the development of two satellites. The Polish Academy of Sciences is funding two additional satellites as well as the Canadian Space Agency resulting in six components for the constellation (© 2012 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.769
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomische NachrichtenSame topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesFrench-language works237,207