La mobilité ethnique intergénérationnelle des enfants de moins de cinq ans chez les populations autochtones, Canada, 1996 et 2001
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Grâce aux données provenant des recensements canadiens de 1996 et 2001, nous avons étudié la mobilité ethnique intergénérationnelle (la transmission ou non de l’identité ethnique d’un parent à son enfant) chez les populations autochtones. Dans l’ensemble, les populations autochtones tirent profit de la mobilité ethnique intergénérationnelle au détriment de la population non autochtone. Un facteur déterminant de ce phénomène est le type d’union au sein duquel vit l’enfant : union endogame ou exogame. Alors que la mobilité ethnique intergénérationnelle est presque inexistante au sein des unions endogames, il en est tout autrement lorsqu’il est question d’unions exogames. Pour le cas particulier de l’exogamie autochtone — non autochtone, l’identité ethnique d’un enfant est, le plus souvent, une identité autochtone. Ainsi, l’exogamie entre Autochtones et non-Autochtones profite beaucoup plus aux effectifs des populations autochtones qu’à ceux de la population non autochtone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".