Assessing an organization's preparedness for the virtual enterprise: the TEMPLET model
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The CALS community has been developing virtual enterprise tools since the mid-1980s. This paper discusses the development of a model of an organization's virtual enterprise capability that draws on the experience and perceptions of the CALS practitioner community. The model, called the TEMPLET model, is a hierarchical model with four main capability elements: technology, information management, organization and process. Specific capabilities for each element are defined. The model was verified through a practitioner survey and a set of field studies. The relative importance of each element and item is discussed. Adjustments to the model are proposed as well as a reduced model that could be used to gain a quick picture of an organization. The TEMPLET model is of interest to practitioners as a model of an organization's VE capability. For the academic community, it provides a model that can be used to develop VE assessment and improvement capability tools. For both communities, it summarizes years of CALS experience and how it impacts on our understanding of the development of virtual enterprises.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it