MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1598854239

Hypothesis testing in a generic nesting framework with general population distributions

2011· preprint· en· W1598854239 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRePEc: Research Papers in Economics · 2011
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNesting (process)Null hypothesisAlternative hypothesisDivergence (linguistics)InferenceMultinomial distributionStatistical hypothesis testingNull (SQL)EconometricsStatistical inferenceMathematicsPopulationStatisticsInequalityComputer scienceData miningArtificial intelligence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nested parameter spaces, either in the null or alternative hypothesis, constitute a guarantee for improving the performance of the tests, however in the existing literature on order restricted inference they have been usually skipped for being studied in detail. Divergence based divergence measures provide a flexible tool for creating meaningful test-statistics, which usually contain the likelihood ratio-test statistics as special case. The existing literature on hypothesis testing with inequality constraints using phidivergence measures, is centered in a very specific models with multinomial sampling. The contribution of this paper consists in extending and unifying widely the existing work: new families of test-statistics are presented, valid for nested parameter spaces containing either equality or inequality constraints and general distributions for either single or multiple populations are considered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.723
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.182
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it