MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Phenotypic Analysis of Human Embryonic Stem Cells

2007· article· en· W1598958175 on OpenAlexaff
Mark Ungrin, Michael D. O’Connor, Connie J. Eaves, Peter W. Zandstra

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Protocols in Stem Cell Biology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPluripotent Stem Cells Research
Canadian institutionsStemcell TechnologiesBC Cancer AgencyUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyEmbryonic stem cellStem cellPhenotypeCell biologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) are an important tool for the study of developmental biology and may one day serve as a source of cells for regenerative medicine. As no definitive assay for hESC pluripotency is available, surrogate assays that measure markers or properties that have been correlated with hESC developmental potential are used to measure the effects of test conditions on their propagation and differentiation. This unit presents a range of protocols, including visual inspection, flow cytometry, immunofluorescence, quantitative real-time reverse-transcriptase PCR, and a colony-forming assay, as tools to measure the undifferentiated hESC state. The authors discuss the advantages and limitations of the various protocols, and present expected results and discuss potential problems. The development of quantitative assays of hESC developmental potential are critical for our understanding of hESC biology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Protocols in Stem Cell BiologySame topicPluripotent Stem Cells ResearchFrench-language works237,207