MétaCan
← all works

Comparison between activity estimates obtained using bioenergetic and behavioural analysesContribution of the Groupe de Recherche Interuniversitaire en Limnologie (GRIL).

2008· article· en· 9 citations· W1599068065 on OpenAlex· 10.1139/f08-080

Why is this work in the frame?

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

Canadian affiliationAn author listed a Canadian institution. This is the only route the usual frame has.
Canadian venueIt was published in a Canadian venue.

The three-model screen

all 1,000 screened works →

1 of 3 models called this metaresearch. This work is contested: it sits on the field's empirical boundary, and whether it counts depends on which model you asked. It is one of the 51 works in the disagreement dossier.

stratum: aff_core · design weight: 5595.24 (the sample is stratified; any rate computed without the weight is wrong)
Claude Opus 4.8OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: medium

Comparison of bioenergetic and behavioural techniques for estimating fish activity; domain measurement validation, not a study of research practice.

GPT-5.6 (high)T1
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: medium

The primary object is the comparative performance and robustness of two research methods for estimating fish activity.

Grok 4.5OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: medium

Compares measurement approaches for fish activity rates to answer an ecological question, not to study research practice.

Abstract

Activity rate of Arctic char ( Salvelinus alpinus ) held in 90 m 2 littoral enclosures were estimated using bioenergetic (with consumption estimated using stable caesium, 133 Cs) and behavioural approaches (with fish movements quantified using video cameras). We found no statistically significant difference between values of activity rate obtained using the two approaches for three of the six experiments we performed. However, there was no relationship between estimates of activity rate obtained using the two approaches. Discrepancies may arise from the difficulty to meet assumptions regarding the temporal stability of the concentration of 133 Cs in fish diet and of the assimilation coefficient of this tracer. When fish remain in an area where their behaviour can be well described (e.g., enclosure, habitat patches of littoral zones, coral reefs), the behavioural approach appears more robust to estimate activity rate because it depends most on a variable that is easiest to estimate (the number of movements performed). When these conditions are not met (low fish densities or major fish migrations), a reliable assessment of the concentration and assimilation of 133 Cs in stomach contents appears critical to implement the bioenergetic approach based on this tracer.

Stored with the screening record, where it is evidence for the labels above.

The record

Venue
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
Topic
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Field
Environmental Science
Canadian institutions
Université de MontréalUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Funders
Keywords
SalvelinusLittoral zoneEnvironmental scienceEcologyCalidrisBioenergeticsFish <Actinopterygii>FisheryHabitatBiologyTrout
Has abstract in OpenAlex
yes